vinicius

About Vinicius Gomes Vieira

This author has not yet filled in any details.
So far Vinicius Gomes Vieira has created 8 blog entries.

Bibliographic References Dynamo Report 129, 130 and 131

2026-10-22T15:01:28-03:0022 de October de 2026|

  • Bharath, S. T., et al. (2011) Lending relationships and loan contract terms. Review of Financial Studies, 24(4)
  • Duhigg, C. (2016) What Google learned from its quest to build the perfect team. The New York Times Magazine, Feb, 26.
  • Dyer, J., Singh H. (1998) The relational view: cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. The Academy of Management Review, vol. 23, n. 4, Oct.
  • Edmondson, A. (1996). Learning from Mistakes is Easier Said Than Done: Group and Organizational Influences on the Detection and Correction of Human Error. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 32(1), 5-28.
  • Edmondson, A. (1999), Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams, Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350-383
  • Glasmeier, A. (1991) Technological discontinuities and flexible production networks: the case of Switzerland and the world watch industry. Research Policy 20, 469-485
  • Gopalan, R. et al. (2011) Why do forms form new banking relationships. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, vol 46, issue 5
  • Grove, A. (1983) High Output Management. Vintage Books, Penguin Random House LLC, NY
  • Grupo Technos (2024) Technos 100 anos: 1924- 2024. Editora Globo
  • Kahneman, D. (2011) Thinking Fast and Slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux. New York
  • Kahneman, D., Sibony, O., Sustein, Cass (2021) Noise: A Flaw in Human Judgement. Little, Brown Spark. NY, Boston, London
  • Mauss, M. (1925) Ensaio sobre a dádiva: forma e razão da troca nas sociedades arcaicas
  • Mawdsley, J. and Somaya, D. (2020) Business growth in knowledge-based services: relational embeddedness and the breadth of added value opportunities. HEC Paris Research Paper n. SPE-2019-1340
  • Pereira, S. (2025) Instituto Português de Relojoaria
  • Rotter, J.B. (1966) Generalized Expectancies for Internal versus External Control of Reinforcement. Psychological Monographs, 80, 1-28.
  • Stanovich, K.E.; West, R.F. (2000). “Individual difference in reasoning: implications for the rationality debate?”. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 23 (5): 645–726
  • Sufi, A. (2007) Informational asymmetry and financing arrangements: evidence from syndicated loans. The Journal of Finance, vol LXII, n.2, Apr.
  • Syed, M. (2015) Black Box Thinking: The Surprising Truth About Success
  • Talebi, R. et al. (2015) How relational embeddedness affects business performance through trust: empirical research on emerging SMEs. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, vol. 26, n. 1
  • Uzzi, B. (1997) Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: the paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly,  Mar 97.
  • Uzzi, B. (2000) The Sources and Consequences of Embeddedness for the Economic Performance of Organizations: The Network Effect. American Sociology Review, Ms. # 94-289
  • Wu, G. et al. (2020) The effect of relational embeddedness, absorptive capacity, and learning orientation on SME’s competitive advantage. Frontiers in Psychology, Jul,2020
  • Zajdela, E. et al. (2026) Back in Fashion: Modeling the Cyclicle Dynamics of Trends. Apresentado no Simpósio Global da Sociedade Americana de Física, mar26.

Bibliographic References Dynamo Report 127 and 128

2026-10-22T15:01:17-03:0022 de October de 2026|

  • Bastiat, F. (1848) O que se vê e o que não se vê, em Frédéric Bastiat, IL.
  • Busch, C. (2024) Towards a Theory of Serendipity: A Systematic Review and Conceptualization. Journal of Management Studies 61:3, May 04.
  • Catmull, E. (2008) How Pixar Fosters Collective Creativity. Harvard Business Review, Sep 08.
  • Cunha, M. (2005) Serendipity: Why Some Organizations are Luckier than Others. Faculdade de Economia, Universidade de Lisboa, May/05.
  • Cunha, M. et al. (2010) On Serendipity and Organizing. European Management Journal, n. 28.
  • De Rond, M. (2005) The Structure of Serendipity. Cambridge Judge Business School, Working Paper 07/05.
  • Dew, N. (2009) Serendipity in Entrepreneurship. Organization Studies 30(07).
  • Fergunson, A. (1767) An Essay on the History of Civil Society, Cambridge.
  • Fultz, A. & K, Hmieleski (2021) The Art of Discovering and Exploiting Unexpected Opportunities: The Roles of Organizational Improvisation and Serendipity in New Venture Performance. Journal of Business Venturing, n. 36.
  • Hayek, F. (1945) The use of knowledge in society. The American Economic Review, vol XXXV, n. 4.
  • Marg, O. et al. (2023) Effects of Transdisciplinary Research on Scientific Knowledge and Reflexivity. Research Evaluation, Oxford Academic, vol. 32, issue 4, Oct.23.
  • Merton, R. K. (1936) The Unanticipated Consequences of Purposive Social Action. American Sociological Review, Vol. 1, Issue 6.
  • Merton, R. K. (1948) The Self-Fulfilling Prophecy. The Antioch Review, 8.
  • Merton, R. K. & Barber, E. (2004) The Travels and Adventure of Serendipity: A Study in Sociolocigal Semantics and the Sociology of Science. Princeton University Press. Princeton and Oxford.
  • Mintzberg, H. (1994) The Rise and Fall of Strategic Planning. Free Press, NY and Toronto.
  • Napier, N. & Vuong, Q. (2013) Serendipity as a Strategic Advantage? Boise State University, ScholarWorks. College Business and Economics.
  • Santos, J. & Williamson, P. (2021) Discovering Strategy: Dealing with Uncertainty by Harnessing Serendipity. Insead, Working Paper 2022/51/STR.
  • Stacey, R. & Mowles, C. (2016) Strategic Management and Organizational Dynamics, 7th edition. Pearson.

Bibliographic References Dynamo Report 126

2026-10-22T15:01:01-03:0022 de October de 2026|

  • Brannon, I. (2018) Diminishing the power of proxy advisory firms. Capital Policy Analytics.
  • Business Roundtable (2023) Letter to the Chairman of House Financial Services Committee and Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations, 12Jul, 23.
  • Cai, J. et al (2009) Electing directors, The Journal of Finance, 64.
  • Choi, S. et al. (2010) The power of proxy advisors: myth or reality, Emory Law Journal 59, 869-918.
  • Copland, J., Larker, D., Tayan, B (2018) Proxy advisory firms: empirical evidence and the case for reform.
  • Department of Labor (1994) Federal Register Volume 59, number 145 (Friday, July 29, 19940], from the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov] [FR Doc No: 94-18198]
  • Daines, R., Goe, I. and Larker, D. (2010) Rating the Ratings: How Good are Commercial Governance Ratings, Journal of Financial Economics, Dec 2010, Vol. 98. Issue 3, pages 439-461.
  • Glass Lewis (2025) Brazil Benchmark Policy Guidelines
  • Haan S. (2023) Voting rights in corporate governance: historical and political economy, electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4299462
  • Hu, E. et al (2024) Custom proxy voting advice. Nov 24.
  • Institutional Shareholder Services – ISS (2018) Letter to Senate banking committee member, electronic available at: https://www.issgovernance.com/file/duediligence/20180530-iss-letter-to-senate-banking-committee-members.pdf
  • Institutional Shareholder Services – ISS (2024a) Brazil Proxy Voting Guidelines: Benchmarks for Policy Recommendations, Jan, 24
  • Institutional Shareholder Services – ISS (2024b) Brazil Remote Voting Card (RVC) Frequently Asked Questions, update Aug 19, 24.
  • Kahan, M. e Rock, E. (2010) Embattled CEOs, Tex L. Rev 987
  • Krahnen, J. et al., (2023) The controversy over proxy voting: the role of asset managers and proxy advisors. Harvard Law School.
  • Larker, D., Scneider, R., Tayan, B., Boyd, A. (2015) Investor Survey: Deconstructing Proxy Statements – What Matters to Investors. Stanford University, RR Donnelley, and Equilar. Feb 15.
  • Malenko, N. e Shen, Y. (2016) The role of proxy advisory firms: evidence from a regression-discontinuity design, The Review of Financial Studies, 29.
  • McCahery, J. (2015) Behind the scenes: the corporate governance preferences of institutional investors. Journal of Finance, forthcoming, jun.
  • Pensions&Investiments (2025) J.P. Morgan´s Dimon slams proxy firms as a ‘cancer’, urges elimination, May,30.
  • Placenti, F. (2018) Are proxy advisory firms really a problem? Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance.
  • Prete, R. (2025) CalPERS CEO: Eliminating proxy firms would harm institutional investors. Jun,18.
  • Rose, P., Walker, C. (2020) Examining the SEC´s proxy advisory rule. Center for Capital Markets Competitiviness.
  • Rose, S. (1990) Optional Cumulative Voting & Staggered Terms of Directors: Is the California Climate Warming to Corporations? 27 San Diego L. Rev. 467, 483 n.133
  • Rosenberg, H. (2000) Mudando de lado: A Luta de Robert A. G. Monks pela Governança Corporativa na América. Editora Campus.
  • SEC (2020) Recommendation of the SEC Investor Advisory Committee (IAC) Relation to SEC Guidance and Rule Proposals on Proxy Advisory and Shareholder Proposals, at 5 (24jan20).
  • Shu, C. (2024) The proxy advisory industry: influencing and being influenced, Journal of financial Economics, forthcoming.
  • Society for Corporate Governance (2020) Letter to US SEC Secretary, RE SEC file number S7-22-19, Feb3.
Go to Top