Referências Bibliográficas Carta Dynamo 127 e 128

2026-04-09T17:53:26-03:009 de abril de 2026|

  • Bastiat, F. (1848) O que se vê e o que não se vê, em Frédéric Bastiat, IL.
  • Busch, C. (2024) Towards a Theory of Serendipity: A Systematic Review and Conceptualization. Journal of Management Studies 61:3, May 04.
  • Catmull, E. (2008) How Pixar Fosters Collective Creativity. Harvard Business Review, Sep 08.
  • Cunha, M. (2005) Serendipity: Why Some Organizations are Luckier than Others. Faculdade de Economia, Universidade de Lisboa, May/05.
  • Cunha, M. et al. (2010) On Serendipity and Organizing. European Management Journal, n. 28.
  • De Rond, M. (2005) The Structure of Serendipity. Cambridge Judge Business School, Working Paper 07/05.
  • Dew, N. (2009) Serendipity in Entrepreneurship. Organization Studies 30(07).
  • Fergunson, A. (1767) An Essay on the History of Civil Society, Cambridge.
  • Fultz, A. & K, Hmieleski (2021) The Art of Discovering and Exploiting Unexpected Opportunities: The Roles of Organizational Improvisation and Serendipity in New Venture Performance. Journal of Business Venturing, n. 36.
  • Hayek, F. (1945) The use of knowledge in society. The American Economic Review, vol XXXV, n. 4.
  • Marg, O. et al. (2023) Effects of Transdisciplinary Research on Scientific Knowledge and Reflexivity. Research Evaluation, Oxford Academic, vol. 32, issue 4, Oct.23.
  • Merton, R. K. (1936) The Unanticipated Consequences of Purposive Social Action. American Sociological Review, Vol. 1, Issue 6.
  • Merton, R. K. (1948) The Self-Fulfilling Prophecy. The Antioch Review, 8.
  • Merton, R. K. & Barber, E. (2004) The Travels and Adventure of Serendipity: A Study in Sociolocigal Semantics and the Sociology of Science. Princeton University Press. Princeton and Oxford.
  • Mintzberg, H. (1994) The Rise and Fall of Strategic Planning. Free Press, NY and Toronto.
  • Napier, N. & Vuong, Q. (2013) Serendipity as a Strategic Advantage? Boise State University, ScholarWorks. College Business and Economics.
  • Santos, J. & Williamson, P. (2021) Discovering Strategy: Dealing with Uncertainty by Harnessing Serendipity. Insead, Working Paper 2022/51/STR.
  • Stacey, R. & Mowles, C. (2016) Strategic Management and Organizational Dynamics, 7th edition. Pearson.

Referências Bibliográficas Carta Dynamo 126

2025-07-10T16:35:46-03:0010 de julho de 2025|

  • Brannon, I. (2018) Diminishing the power of proxy advisory firms. Capital Policy Analytics.
  • Business Roundtable (2023) Letter to the Chairman of House Financial Services Committee and Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations, 12Jul, 23.
  • Cai, J. et al (2009) Electing directors, The Journal of Finance, 64.
  • Choi, S. et al. (2010) The power of proxy advisors: myth or reality, Emory Law Journal 59, 869-918.
  • Copland, J., Larker, D., Tayan, B (2018) Proxy advisory firms: empirical evidence and the case for reform.
  • Department of Labor (1994) Federal Register Volume 59, number 145 (Friday, July 29, 19940], from the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov] [FR Doc No: 94-18198]
  • Daines, R., Goe, I. and Larker, D. (2010) Rating the Ratings: How Good are Commercial Governance Ratings, Journal of Financial Economics, Dec 2010, Vol. 98. Issue 3, pages 439-461.
  • Glass Lewis (2025) Brazil Benchmark Policy Guidelines
  • Haan S. (2023) Voting rights in corporate governance: historical and political economy, electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4299462
  • Hu, E. et al (2024) Custom proxy voting advice. Nov 24.
  • Institutional Shareholder Services – ISS (2018) Letter to Senate banking committee member, electronic available at: https://www.issgovernance.com/file/duediligence/20180530-iss-letter-to-senate-banking-committee-members.pdf
  • Institutional Shareholder Services – ISS (2024a) Brazil Proxy Voting Guidelines: Benchmarks for Policy Recommendations, Jan, 24
  • Institutional Shareholder Services – ISS (2024b) Brazil Remote Voting Card (RVC) Frequently Asked Questions, update Aug 19, 24.
  • Kahan, M. e Rock, E. (2010) Embattled CEOs, Tex L. Rev 987
  • Krahnen, J. et al., (2023) The controversy over proxy voting: the role of asset managers and proxy advisors. Harvard Law School.
  • Larker, D., Scneider, R., Tayan, B., Boyd, A. (2015) Investor Survey: Deconstructing Proxy Statements – What Matters to Investors. Stanford University, RR Donnelley, and Equilar. Feb 15.
  • Malenko, N. e Shen, Y. (2016) The role of proxy advisory firms: evidence from a regression-discontinuity design, The Review of Financial Studies, 29.
  • McCahery, J. (2015) Behind the scenes: the corporate governance preferences of institutional investors. Journal of Finance, forthcoming, jun.
  • Pensions&Investiments (2025) J.P. Morgan´s Dimon slams proxy firms as a ‘cancer’, urges elimination, May,30.
  • Placenti, F. (2018) Are proxy advisory firms really a problem? Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance.
  • Prete, R. (2025) CalPERS CEO: Eliminating proxy firms would harm institutional investors. Jun,18.
  • Rose, P., Walker, C. (2020) Examining the SEC´s proxy advisory rule. Center for Capital Markets Competitiviness.
  • Rose, S. (1990) Optional Cumulative Voting & Staggered Terms of Directors: Is the California Climate Warming to Corporations? 27 San Diego L. Rev. 467, 483 n.133
  • Rosenberg, H. (2000) Mudando de lado: A Luta de Robert A. G. Monks pela Governança Corporativa na América. Editora Campus.
  • SEC (2020) Recommendation of the SEC Investor Advisory Committee (IAC) Relation to SEC Guidance and Rule Proposals on Proxy Advisory and Shareholder Proposals, at 5 (24jan20).
  • Shu, C. (2024) The proxy advisory industry: influencing and being influenced, Journal of financial Economics, forthcoming.
  • Society for Corporate Governance (2020) Letter to US SEC Secretary, RE SEC file number S7-22-19, Feb3.

Referências Bibliográficas Carta Dynamo 125

2025-05-15T07:17:20-03:0014 de maio de 2025|

  • Arrow, K. (1963) Uncertainty and the welfare economics of medical care. The American Economic Review, volume LIII, number 5.
  • Grossman, M. (1972) The Demand for Health: A Theoretical and Empirical Investigation. Columbia University Press, NY.
  • Junior, H. (2024) O papel da pesquisa médica no avanço do conhecimento em saúde: e agora? Brazilian Journal of Clinical Medicine and Review.
  • Keynes, J. M. (1936) The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money. London, Macmillan.
  • Parsons, T.  (1951) The Social System. Routledge Sociology Classics.
  • Pedroso, M., Malik, A, (2015) As quatro dimensões competitivas da saúde. Harvard Business Review Brasil, maio2015.
  • Piola, S., Vianna, S. (1995) Economia da Saúde: conceitos e contribuição para a gestão da saúde. Ipea, Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada.

Referências Bibliográficas Cartas Dynamo 123 e 124

2025-05-15T08:01:18-03:0031 de janeiro de 2020|

  • Asness, C. (2024) The less-efficient market hypothesis. Forthcoming in the 50th Anniversary of the Journal of Portfolio Management.
  • Asness, C. (2023) No one would call Warren Buffett a Quant. Interview for Bloomberg Wealth and David Rubenstein, recorded on Apr, 24th.
  • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T8ehhjPpoHk
  • Bank of America (BofA, 2025) Thematic Investing: The world in 2030, jan25
  • Bebchuk, L., Hirst, S. (2019) The specter of the giant three. ecgi, Finance Working Paper n. 608/2019
  • Bebchuk, L., Hirst, S. (2020) Index funds and the future of corporate governance: theory, evidence and policy. Ecgi, Law Working Paper n. 433/2018
  • Beck, P., Bouchaud, JP, Villamaina, D. (2024) Ponzi funds. https://ssrn.com/abstract=4834390
  • Beggs, W., Brogaard, J., Hill-Kleespie, A. (2019) Quantitative Investing and Market Instability.
  • Electronic copy available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3281447
  • Bender, M., Claphan, B., Scwemmhein, B. (2024) Shifting volumes to the close: consequences for price discovery and market quality.
  • Biais, B. & Foucault, T. (2014) HFT and Market Quality. Bankers, Markets & Investors n. 128, jan-fev14.
  • SSRN https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4757345
  • Berkin, A., Swedroe, L. (2016) Your Complete Guide to Factor-Based Investing. Bam Alliance Press.
  • Bernstein, P. (1999) The Velocity of Learning and the Future of Active Management. Economics and Portfolio Strategy.
  • Bouchaud, JP., Bonart, J., Donier, J., Gould, M. (2018) Trades, Quotes and Prices. Financial Markets under the Microscope. Cambridge University Press.
  • Bouchaud, JP (2021) The inelastic market hypothesis: a microstructural interpretation. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3896981
  • Bouchaud, JP (2022) Post at Linkedin
  • https://www.linkedin.com/posts/jean-philippe-bouchaud-bb08a15_markets-microstructure-noise-activity-7009627137687044096-Zcm0/
  • Brasil, Bolsa, Balcão, (B3, 2024) Pessoas Físicas – Uma analise da evolução dos investidores na B3. Set24
  • Brav, A., Mlenko, A., Malenko, N. (2023) Corporate Governance implications of the passive growth in indexing. ecgi, Finance Working Paper n. 849/2023
  • Buffett, W. (2017) Berkshire Hathaway, Shareholders Letter 2016
  • Business Wire, (2018) Index Industry Association Surveys the Index Universe
  • Chen, K., Heater, J. (2024) Passive funds, ownership dynamics, and corporate governance.
  • Cochrane, J. (2011) Discount Rates. NBER, Working Paper 16972
  • Comissão de Valores Mobiliarios CVM(2021) Ofertas RLP–Nova Proposta para expansão do programa experimental. Ofício Interno n. 33/2021/CVM/GMA-2
  • Cox, R., Kamolsareeratana, A., Kouwenberg (2020) Compulsive Gambling in the Financial Markets: Evidence from Two Investors Survey. Journal of Banking and Finance 111
  • Doherty, K. (2025) Wall Street enters a darker age with most stock trading hidden, Bloomberg, 24. Jan.25.
  • Dynamo (2012) Carta Dynamo 73, ¼ 2012
  • Fisch, J., Hamdani, A., Solomon, S. (2020) The new titans of Wall Street: a theoretical framework for passive investors. ecgi, Law Working Paper n. 414/2018
  • Gabaix, X., Koijen., X. (2021) In search of the origins of financial fluctuations: the inelastic market hypothesis. NBER, working paper 28967
  • GMO (2024) FAQ: Passive Investing, Quarterly Letter 2Q2024
  • Haddad, V., Huebner, P., Loualiche, E. (2024) How competitive is the stock market? Theory, evidence from portfolios, and implications for the rise of passive investing.
  • Harford, J. (2017) Why the worlds biggest investor backs the simplest investment. BBC Radio World Service, 50 Things That Made the Modern Economy
  • Hofner, P., Schlag, C., Schmeling, M. (2023) Passive investing and market quality
  • Ilmanen, A. (2022) Investing Amid Low Expected Returns: Making the Most When Markets Offer the Least. John Wiley & Sons
  • International Monetary Fund (2024) Global Stability Financial Report. Steadying the Course: Uncertainty, Artificial Intelligence, and Financial Stability. Oct, 2024.
  • Kirilenko, A., Kylw, A., Samadi, M., Tuzun, T. (2014) The Flash Crash: The Impact of High Frequency Trading on an Electronic Market.
  • Kumar, A. (2009) Who gambles in the stock market? The journal of finance jul2009.
  • La Roche, J. (2016) 20 years ago, Bill Ackman asked Warren Buffett and Charlie Munger about a risk the market faces today. Yahoo!finance
  • Morningstar (2024) Morningstar´s US Actice/Passive Barometer. Sep24
  • Nahar, J., Nishat, N., Shoaib, A., Hossain, Q. (2024) Market efficiency and stability in the era of HFT: a comprehensive review. ResearchGate jun24.
  • Pedersen, L. (2018) Sharpening the arithmetic of active management. Financial Analysts Journal, 74 (1)
  • (2018) The (mis)uses of the S&P 500. The University of Chicago Business Law Review (vol2) https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3205235
  • Robertson, A. (2019) Passive in name only: delegated management and “index” investing https://ssrn.com/abstract=3244991
  • Sharp, W. (1991) The arithmetic of active management, Financial Analysts Journal 47 (1)
  • Slimmon, A., Delany, L. (2018) Quantamental Investing: The Future is Now. Morgan Stanley Investment Management, May, 2018.,
  • Surowiecki, J. (2004) The Wisdom of Crowds: Why the Many Are Smarter Than the Few and How Collective Wisdom Shapes Business, Economies, Societies and Nations,
  • Udland, M. (2017) Jack Bogle envisions chaos, catastrophe in markets if everyone were to index. Yahoo!finance
  • Wigglesworth, R. (2021) Trillions: How a Band of Wall Street Renegades Invented the Index Fund and Changed Finance Forever. Portfolio/Penguin.
  • Zhang, F., Powell, S. (2011) The impact of HFT on markets. CFA Magazine, mar/apr2011.

Referências Bibliográficas Cartas Dynamo 121 e 122

2025-05-15T08:01:09-03:0030 de janeiro de 2020|

  • Companies mentioned:
  • BP, Chevron, ConocoPhillips, Enel, Engie, ENI, E.ON, Equinor, Exxon Mobil, Iberdrola, Marathon, Occidental Petroleum, Phillips 66, Repsol, Saudi Aramco, Shell, Total Energies, Valero
  • Documents:
  • Articles of Association Bylaws Proxy Statements and Votings
  • Specific Documents on Energy Transition
  • BP (2023, 2024) From IOC to IEC; Net Zero Ambition: Progress Update
  • Chevron (2023) Advancing Energy Progress: Climate Change Resilience Report
  • ConocoPhillips (2022-2023) Plan for the Net-Zero Energy Transition: Progress Report
  • Enel (2022, 2023) Zero Emission Ambition; Sustainability Report
  • Engie (2022, 2023, 2024) Integrated Reports; Climate Reports
  • ENI (2023) For A Just Transition
  • E.ON (2023) Integrated Annual Report: It´s on us
  • Equinor 2022, 2023) Energy Transition Plan; The Equinor Book; Integrated Annual Report
  • Exxon Mobil (2024) Advancing Climate Solutions
  • Iberdrola (2023) Sustainability Report; Purposes and Values of the Iberdrola Group
  • Marathon (2023) Perspectives on Climate-Relate Scenarios: Risk and Opportunities
  • Occidental (2023) Climate Report: Leading the Way in Carbon Management
  • Phillips 66 (2024) Sustainability and People Report
  • Repsol (2023, 2024) Integrated Management Report; Global Sustainability Plan
  • Saudi Aramco (2022) Investing in Growth, Innovating for Sustainability
  • Shell (2021, 2024) Energy Transition Strategy; Energy Transition Progress Report
  • Total Energies (2022, 2023) Company Strategy; Sustainability & Climate – Progress Report
  • Valero (2023) ESG Report
  • Other Papers, Reports and Books:
  • Bebchuk, L., Kastiel, K., Tallarita, R. (2021) For Whom Corporate Leaders Bargain. Southern California Law Review.
  • Bebchuk, L., Kastiel, K., Tallarita, R. (2022) Does Enlighted Shareholder Value Add Value? Harvard Law School, Discussion Paper n. 1077.
  • Bebchuk, L., Tallarita, R. (2020) The Illusory Promise of Stakeholder Governance
  • Bebchuk, L., Tallarita, R. (2022) Will Corporations Deliver Value to All Stakeholders? Harvard John M. Olin Center for Law, Economics, and Business, Discussion Paper n. 1078.
  • Condon, M. (2023) What´s Scope 3 Good For? University of California, Davis, vol 56:1921.
  • Davies, P. (2023) Shareholder Voice and Corporate Purpose: The Purposelessness of Mandatory Corporate Purpose Statements. ecgi, Law Working Paper n. 666.
  • Freshfields (2024) Trends and Updates from the 2024 Proxy Season
  • Friedman, M. (1962) Capitalism and Freedom. The University of Chicago Press.
  • Friedman, M. (1970) The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits. The New York times.
  • Gatti, M., Gomtsian, S. & Romano, A. (2024) Corporate Governance for Carbon Majors. ecgi, Working Paper n. 787.
  • Gen, G. (2024) ESG, Externalities, and the Limits of the Business Judgement Rule: TEPCO Derivative Suit on Fukushima Nuclear Accident and the Expansion of Caremark. ecgi, Law Working Paper n. 780.
  • Gowan, J. (2024) To Survival Legal Challenges, SEC Must Remove Scope 3 From Sustainability Reporting Rule. Bloomberg Finance.
  • Hart, O. & Zingales, L. (2017) Companies Should Maximize Shareholder Welfare Not Market Value. Journal of Law, Finance, and Accounting, 2.
  • & Zingales, L. (2022) The New Corporate Governance. University of Chicago Business Law Review, vol 1, Issue 1.
  • Humphrey, J. et al. (2021) The Asymmetry in Responsible Investment Preferences. NBER, Working Paper 29288.
  • IEA – International Energy Association (2023a) Net Zero Roadmap – A Global Pathway to Keep the 1.5oC Goal in Reach.
  • IEA – International Energy Association (2023b) Energy Outlook 2023
  • IEA – International Energy Association (2023c) Global Energy Transitions Stocktake -https://www.iea.org/topics/global-energy-transitions-stocktake
  • IPCC – The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2018) Special Report on Global Warming of 1.5oC
  • Justia Law (1919) Dodge x Ford US Michigan Supreme Court Decisions 170 N.W. 688
  • Lan, L., Wan, W. (2024) ESG and Director´s Duties: Defining and Advancing the Interests of the Company. ecgi, Working Paper no 737.
  • Mayer, C. (2018) Prosperity: Better Business Makes the Greater Good. Oxford University Press.
  • Mayer, C. (2022) What is Wrong with Corporate Law? The Purpose of Law and the Law of Purpose. ECGI Working Paper n. 649/2022.
  • Promarket Writers (2016) Unusual Debate at Davos: Lobbying, Maximizing Shareholder Value and the Duty of CEOs. Apr 1, 2016.
  • Promarket (2020) Milton Friedman 50 Years Latter. Stilger Center at the University of Chicago Booth School of Business.
  • Rajan, R., Ramella, P., Zingales, L. (2023) What Purpose Do Corporations Purport? Evidence From Letters to Shareholders. NBER, Working Paper 31054.
  • Roe, M. (2021) Dodge x Ford: What Happened and Why? ecgi, Law Working Paper n. 619
  • Royal Courts of Justice of England and Wales – RCJEW (2023) ClientEarth x Shell. Case no: BL-2023-000215
  • Smil, V. (2024) Halfway Between Kyoto and 2050: Zero Carbon is a Highly Unlikely Outcome
  • WRI & WBCSD – World Resources Institute and World Business Council for Sustainable Development (2001) Greenhouse Gas Protocol: A Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard
  • U.S. Department of Labor (2022) US Department of Labor Announces Final Rule to Remove Barriers to Considering Environmental, Social, and Governance Factors in Plan Investments – https://www.dol.gov/newsroom/releases/ebsa/ebsa20221122
  • U.S. Supreme Court (2014) Fifth Third Bancorp x Dudenhoeffer, 573 US 409.

Referências Bibliográficas da Carta Dynamo 118

2025-05-15T07:19:13-03:0029 de janeiro de 2020|

  • BCG (Boston Consulting Group), 2022. Brazil Climate Report: Seizing Brazil´s Climate Potential. Brazil Climate Summit, Sep22.
  • Chausson, A. et al. (2020) Mapping the effectiveness of nature-based solutions fir climate change adaptation. Glob Change Biol, 2020,26.
  • GCCSI (Global Carbon Capture and Storage Institute), 2022. Global Status of CCS 2022: Ambition & Action.
  • European Commission, 2021. Evaluating the Impact of Nature-based Solutions: A Handbook for Practitioners. Directorate-General for Research and Innovation.
  • Girardin, C. et al. (2021) Nature-Based Solutions can help cool the planet – if we act now. Nature, vol 593, May21.
  • IBRD (International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank), 2021. A Catalogue of Nature-Based Solutions for Urban Resilience.
  • IEA (International Energy Association), 2020. Energy Technology Perspectives 2020: Special Report on Carbon Capture Utilisation and Storage, CCUS in clean energy transition.
  • IEA (International Energy Association), 2021. Net Zero by 2050: A Roadmap for the Global Energy Sector. Revised edition, Oct21.
  • IEA (International Energy Association), 2022. Legal and Regulatory Frameworks for CCUS: An IEA CCUS Handbook.
  • IEF (International Energy Forum), 2021. Strategies to Scale Carbon Capture, Utilization and Storage. Dialogue Insight Report, Sep21.
  • Ketzer, J., org. (2018) Atlas Brasileiro de Captura e Armazenamento Geológico de CO2. GCCSI, ediPUCRS.
  • Kleidon, A. (2021) What limits photosynthesis? Identifying the thermodynamic constraints of
  • the terrestrial biosphere within the Earth system. BBA- Biogenetics, 1862 (2021) 148303.
  • Liu, Z. et al. (2023) Monitoring global carbon emissions in 2022. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment. Vol 4, Apr23.
  • Samaniego, J. et al. (2022) Nature-Based Solutions and Carbon Dioxide Removal. Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC). United Nations publication.

Referências Bibliográficas das Cartas Dynamo 116 e 117

2025-05-15T08:00:40-03:0028 de janeiro de 2020|

  • Berry, C. (1978) Alternative Dimensions of Corporate Diversification: An Entropy Approach, Centre de Recherches Interdisciplinaires Droit-et-Economie, Institut des Sciences Economiques.
  • Bezos, J. (2011 e 2013) Letter to Shareholders.
  • Bodell, L. (2017) Why Simple Wins: Escape the Complexity Trap and Get to Work That Matters. Bibliomotion.
  • Bratianu, C. (2019) Exploring Knowledge Entropy in Organizations. Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, vol 7, n.3.
  • Cohen, J. & Stewart, I. (1994) The Collapse of Chaos: Discovering Simplicity on a Complex World. Penguin Books.
  • Collison, S. & Jay, M. (2012) From Complexity to Simplicity: Unleash your Organization Potential. Palgrave Macmillan.
  • DeMarco, T. & Lister, T. (1979) Peopleware: Productive Projects and Teams. Addison-Wesley.
  • Eckart, P. (2020) Simplicity for Success in Business – Essentials: The Best of Silicon Valley and McKinsey.
  • Gill, G. (2020) Complexity, Information Technology and Strategic Decision-Making. Lectures:
  • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jfinHCX0jyc&t=1646s

Gribbin, J. (200) Deep Simplicity: Bringing Order to Chaos and Complexity. Random House, NY.

Hastings, R. (2009) Netflix Culture: Freedom & Responsibility.

 

Hershey, D. (2010) Entropy Theory of Aging Systems: Humans, Corporations and the Universe. Imperial College Press.

  • Hobsbawm, J. (2020) The Simplicity Principle: Six Steps Towards Clarity in a Complex World.
  • Hock, D. (2005) One From Many: VISA and the Rise of Chaordic Organization. Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc. San Francisco, CA.

 

Klein, J. (2000) Corporate Fail by Design: Why organizations Are Built to Fail. Quorum Books, Westport (CO), London.

Kniberg, H. (2014) Spotify engineering culture. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4GK1NDTWbkY

Leonard, M. (2015 e 2021) Constellation Software, Inc.: To Our Shareholders.

  • Maeda, J. (2006) The Laws of Simplicity: Design, Technology, Business, Life
  • Martinez-Berumen, H. et al. (2014) Developing a Method to Evaluate Entropy in Organizational Systems. Conference on Systems Engineering Research, ScienceDirect.
  • Morin, E. (2008) On Complexity. Hampton Press, Inc., New Jersey.
  • Rycrft, R. & Kash, D. (2004) Self-Organizing Innovation Networks: Implications for Globalization. Techovation, 24 0(3), mar,2004.
  • Siegel, A. & Etzkorn, I. (2013) Simple: Conquering the Crisis of Complexity. Twelve, NY, Boston.
  • Silverberg, G. (2007) Self-Organization of R&D search in complex technology space. Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, ResearchGate, feb.2007.
  • Taleb, N. (2014) Antifragile: Things That Gain from Disorder. Random House, NY.
  • Wheatley, M. & Kellner-Rogers, M. (1996) A Simpler Way. Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc. San Francisco, CA.

 

Referências Bibliográficas das Cartas Dynamo 114 e 115

2025-05-15T07:19:38-03:0027 de janeiro de 2020|

  • Bebchuk, L. & Hirst, S. (2020) Index funds and the future of corporate governance: theory, evidence and policy. ecgi, working paper n. 433/18.
  • Bebchuk, L. & Kastiel, K. (2019) The perils of small-minority controllers. Harvard Law School, discussion paper n. 895.
  • Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann LLP (2018) When one share does not mean one vote: the fight against dual-class capital structures. Lexology.
  • Carvalhosa, M. (1998) Comentários à lei das Sociedades Anônimas. Editora Saraiva.
  • Cheffins, B. (2012) The History of corporate governance. ecgi, working paper n. 184/12.
  • Choi, A. (2016) Concentrated ownership and long-term shareholder value. Harvard Business Law Review, vol. 8.
  • Coates, J. (2018) The Future of Corporate governance part I: the problem of twelve. Harvard Law School.
  • Dyck, A. & Zingales, L. (2002) Private benefits of control: an international comparison. NBER working paper series.
  • Franks, J. & Mayer, C. (2017) Evolution of ownership and control around the world: the changing face of capitalism. ecgi, working paper n. 503/17.
  • Franks, J. (2020) Institutional ownership and governance. ecgi, working paper n. 656/20.
  • Gilson, R. (2005) Controlling shareholders and corporate governance: complicating the comparative taxonomy. ecgi, working paper n. 49/05.
  • Gilson, R. (2016) From corporate law to corporate governance. ecgi, working paper n. 324/16.
  • Gilson, R. & Gordon, J. (2013) The Agency costs of agency capitalism: activist investors and the revaluation of governance rights. Columbia University School of Law, working paper n. 438.
  • Gilson, R. & Schwartz, A. (2014) Corporate control and credible commitment. Cópia eletrônica disponível em: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2182781#
  • Goshen, Z. & Hamdani, A. (2016) Corporate control and idiosyncratic vision. The Yale Law Journal.
  • Goyder, M. & Zimmerman, H. (2010) Tomorrow´s corporate governance: bridging the UK engagement gap through Swedish-style nomination committees. Center for Tomorrow´s Company.
  • Kim, H. & Michaely, R. (2019) Sticking around too long? Dynamics of the benefits of dual-class voting. Swiss Finance Institute. Research paper series n. 19-09.
  • La Porta, R. et al. (1996) Law and finance. NBER Working Paper n. 5661.
  • Lekvall, P. (ed.) (2014) The Nordic corporate governance model. SNS Forlag.
  • Pargendler, M. (2016) The corporate governance obsession. The Journal of Corporation Law, vol. 22:2.
  • Pargendler, M. (2019) Controlling shareholders in the twenty-first century: complicating corporate governance beyond agency costs. ecgi, working paper n. 483/19.
  • Kim, H. & Michaely, R. (2019) Sticking around too long? Dynamics of the benefits of dual-class voting. Swiss Finance Institute. Research paper series n. 19-09.

Referências Bibliográficas das Cartas Dynamo 112 e 113

2025-05-15T07:20:08-03:0026 de janeiro de 2020|

  • Bolton, P. et al. (2020) The green swan. Central banking and financial stability in the age of climate change. Bank for International Settlements.
  • Brack, D. (2003) Monitoring the Montreal Protocol, in Findlay, Trevor (ed.) Verification Yearbook.
  • Burke, M. & Hsiang, S. (2015) Global non-Linear Effect of Temperature on Economic Production. Nature, Oct-2015.
  • Carbon Disclosure Protocol, CDP. (2021) Nearly Half of World´s Biggest Companies Factoring Cost of Carbon into Business. Apr-21
  • Carattini, S., Levin, S. & Tavoni, A. (2019) Cooperation in the climate commons. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, vol. 13, issue 2, summer 19.
  • Centro Brasileiro de Relações Internacionais, CEBRI (2021) Mercado de carbono e artigo: perspectivas para a área florestal. Núcleo Meio Ambiente e Mudança do Clima, evento online ago, 2021.
  • Centro Brasileiro de Relações Internacionais, CEBRI (2021) As soluções baseadas na natureza (NBS) & green finance: o papel do Acordo de Paris. Núcleo Meio Ambiente e Mudança do Clima, evento online set, 2021.
  • Centro Brasileiro de Relações Internacionais, CEBRI (2021) Mudança climática, governos e o setor financeiro: o caminho a seguir. Uma conversa com Mark Carney. Núcleo Meio Ambiente e Mudança do Clima, evento online dez, 2021.
  • Centro de Debates de Políticas Públicas, CDPP. (2021) Mudanças Climáticas e a Precificação de Carbono. Desafios e Oportunidades de Mercados de Carbono no Brasil. Relatório Completo, out21.
  • Cooper, R. (2017) The Case for Pricing Greenhouse Gas Emissions. In Cramton, P. et. al (ed.).
  • Crampton, P., Ockenfels, A. & Tirole, J. (2017) Translating the collective climate goal into a common climate commitment. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, vol. 11, issue 1, winter 17.
  • Cramton, P., et al. (ed.), (2017). Global Carbon Pricing: The Path to Climate Cooperation. The MIT Press.
  • Cullenward, D. & Victor, D. (2020) Making Climate Policy Work. Polity Press, Cambridge.
  • Esty. D. & Moffa, A. (2019) Why climate change collective action has failed and what needs to be done within and without the trade regime. Journal of International Economic Law 15(3)
  • European Union (2021). Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the Functioning of the European Carbon Market. 26.10.2021
  • Goldie-Scot, L. (2019) A Behind the Scenes Take on Lithium-ion Battery Prices. BloombergNEF, mar-2019.
  • International Emissions Trading Association – IETA (2019).  The Economic Potential of Article 6 of the Paris Agreement and Implementation Challenges. Sep, 2019.
  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change – IPCC (2021). Climate Change 2021, The Physical Science Basis. WHO & UNEP.
  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change – IPCC (2022). Climate Change 2022, Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. WHO & UNEP.
  • International Energy Association – IEA (2015) World Energy Outlook 2015.
  • International Energy Association – IEA (2021) World Energy Outlook 2021.
  • International Renewable Energy Agency – IRENA (2020) Renewable Power Generation Costs in 2020.
  • Jenkins, J. (2019) Why Carbon Pricing Falls Short: And What to Do about It. Kleinman Center for Energy Policy, University of Pennsylvania, School of Design.
  • Jagers, S. et al. (2019) On the Preconditions of Large-scale Collective Action. The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, mar-19.
  • Johannesson, E. (2017) An Analysis of the Paris Agreement. Uppsala Universitet.
  • Kahneman, D. (2013) Thinking, Fast and Slow.
  • Kop, R. (2012) The Climate Has Changed – So Must Policy. Resources for the Future.
  • Krauss, L. (2021) The Physics of Climate Change. Head of Zeus Ltd, London.
  • Kusnetz, N. (2021) Why the Paris Agreement might be doomed to fail? Inside Climate News.org
  • Nobre, C. (2021) A Savanização da Amazônia já está ocorrendo. Entrevista jornal Valor Econômico, 5.fev.21.
  • Nordhaus, W. (2013) The Climate cassino: risk, uncertainty, and economics for a warming world. Yale University Press.
  • Nordhaus, W. (2017) Climate Clubs and Carbon Pricing. In Cramton, P. et. al (ed.).
  • Nordhaus, W. (2021) The Spirit of green: the economics of collisions and contagions in a crowded world. Princeton University Press.
  • Olstrom, E. (1990) Governing the Commons. The Evolution of Institutions for a Collective Action. Indiana University. Cambridge University Press.
  • Olstrom, E. (2014) A Polycentric approach for coping with climate change. Annals of Economics and Finance 15-1.
  • Ou, Y. et al. (2021) Can updated climate pledges limit warming well below 2°C? Science. 2021 Nov 5; 374(6568):693-695.
  • Parry, I. (2017) Reflections on the International Coordination of Carbon Princing. In Cramton, P. et. al (ed.).
  • Pindyck, R. (2021) Climate Future: Averting and Adapting to Climate Change. Sloan School of Management, MIT, Cambridge.
  • Prolo, C.D., Penido, G., Santos, I.T., & La Hoz Theuer, S. (2021). Explicando os mercados de carbono na era do Acordo de Paris. Rio de Janeiro: Instituto Clima e Sociedade.
  • Seroa da Motta, R. (2018) Diálogos 4 – Precificação de Carbono – Palestra https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FN0OOZK2cqc
  • Stiglitz, J. (2017) Overcoming the Copenhagen Failure with Flexible Commitments. In Cramton, P. et. al (ed.).
  • The World Bank (2021) State and trends of carbon pricing 2021.
  • Tubiana, L. (2021) The Éminence grise at Paris Agreement. Podcast at Cleaningup. Sep, 21.
  • https://www.cleaningup.live/ep-54-laurence-tubiana-the-eminence-grise-of-the-paris-agreement/
  • Tubiana, L. (2021) The future of climate policy. Podcast at Columbia Energy Exchange, Dec. 7
  • Columbia | SIPA Center on Global Energy Policy | The Future of Climate Diplomacy
  • Warren, R. et al. (2018) The projected effect on insects, vertebrates, and plants of limiting global warming to 1.5oC rather than 2oC. Science, v. 360, Issue 6390.
  • Wewerinke-Singh, M. & Doebbler, C. (2016) The Paris Agreement: Some Critical Reflections on Process and Substance. University of South Wales Law Journal, volume 39(4).
  • United Nations – Sustainable Development Solutions Network (2021). Science Panel for the Amazon – Assessment Report 2021, Executive Summary.

Referências bibliograficas das Cartas Dynamo n. 110 e 111

2025-05-13T16:49:22-03:0025 de janeiro de 2020|

  • Anave (1996) Memórias do setor, Leon Feffer, n. 75, abr/mai-96
  • Anave (1999) Homenagem – Leon Feffer, n. 85, abr-99
  • Anave (2006) Leon Feffer: O pioneiro no desenvolvimento da celulose de eucalipto, n.124
  • Campos E., Foelkel, C. (2016) A evolução tecnológica do setor de celulose e papel no Brasil. ABCTP
  • Ferreira, M. e Santos, P. (1997) Melhoramento genético dos Eucalyptus no Brasil: breve histórico e perspectivas. Conferência IUFRO
  • Foelkel, C. (2005) Eucalipto no Brasil, história de pioneirismo. Visão Agrícola n.4, jul-dez-2005.
  • Foelkel, C. (2016) As biorrefinarias integradas no setor brasileiro de fabricação de celulose e papel de eucalipto. ABCTP, revisão n.7, mai-16.
  • Material Economics (2018) Sustainable packaging: the role of material substitution
  • The Pew Charitable Trust (2020) Breaking the plastic wave: a comprehensive assessment of pathways towards stopping ocean plastic solution.
Ir ao Topo